The pedo Godfather made the EU an offer they can’t refuse
The pedo Godfather made the EU an offer they can’t refuse! He said “We support your rearmament - now buy from us or else.” Such a sweet man, an absolute teddy bear.
This is the moral and ethical equivalent of running an extortion racket in your neighbourhood. The T&Cs of arms procurement from the US includes US supply chain logistics that are required to keep the weapons functioning correctly. Not only does this hand primary weapons’ control to the vendor, but it also creates a captive market tied to said single vendor.
Further, the architecture of the command and control infrastructure for all US weapons systems requires American technicians, American satellite systems, and American authorization protocols for certain functions. This is well documented and simply a fait accompli. So, who actually controls that architecture when the battle field shit starts flying? This is genuinely terrifying.
Given trump’s compromised relationship with Putin, you can just imagine how a future with the US embedded in the EU defence infrastructure will work out. He’ll probably give the back door control codes to Putin to turn a live battlefield operation into a keystone cops episode for the EU. Further, Trump is unstable, going from rage to joy over triviality in a heartbeat, is brutally cruel, insanely petty, and as stupid as the day is long. He also has the “Epstein chip” embedded in his brain which is controlled by golom and Putin, the tails that wag the dog.
Let me offer you a real world analogy, one that should resonate with any who see this.
The ‘offer EU can’t refuse’ is like buying a computer and then having the vendor decide how and when you use it, when you change parts, and, most significantly dictates who you buy replacement parts from. This is an ancient business paradigm from the time of the mainframe dinosaurs that dominated the early adopter marketplace. IBM’s “FUD” strategy (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) is the classic reference. They kept customers locked in by making switching feel too risky, which is the same playbook behind the messaging, but with artillery instead of punch cards, terminals and software.
Today, we’re still tied to the vendor for systems updates, but they’re free and one can choose whether or not to upgrade. This does not touch upon the fuckery they get up to with software which manages, manipulates and stores your data, your digital life, but that’s a separate conversation.
But, imagine if the bastards could reach into our machines and directly affect and control your machine at bit, byte, and hardware level, changing your digital output on the fly, ensuring compliance with their messaging without you being aware.
It’s interesting to compare the two environments of weapons systems and IT systems.
The US banned Huawei, TikTok, and Chinese hardware across government systems explicitly on the grounds of embedded backdoors and state control on the largely evidence-free grounds that China builds surveillance and control into its products at a fundamental level.
Do you suppose they meant like the US does through its embedded weapons architecture command and control infrastructure for all US weapons systems sold? Perhaps when Washington pointed at Huawei, it was holding up a mirror? You don’t recognise that vulnerability in an adversary’s technology unless you’re already doing it yourself. The accusation is the confession. Those who know exactly how the trick is done are the ones who spot it first.
Is any of this vaguely familiar? It’s just like the playbook the Epstein administration uses. Projection, accusation as confession. There can’t be a connection, surely? Yes there is, and stop calling me Shirley.
The EU has been slowly, painfully trying to build digital sovereignty through GDPR, through pushing for European cloud infrastructure, through the Digital Markets Act. They understand the principle when it comes to software.
The question is why the same logic hasn’t been applied with the same urgency to weapons systems, where the stakes are incomparably higher. Ukraine is giving us the time to do something about this. Let’s not waste the opportunity.