How does a paternity test change the argument

For those who reject this as an anti-Semitic or anti Zionist rant, please research the words in the preface; trust, but verify.

Preface
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, former Chief Sephardi Rabbi of Israel and spiritual leader of the Shas Party, publicly stated: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world” — and compared the lives of non-Jews to donkeys kept alive only to serve Jews.

Scripture as title deed is blatant babbling bullshit.

But “God said so” as the basis for territorial sovereignty in international law is indeed fairy tale as policy.

My religion promised me and my people the whole of the subcontinent of India some umpty thump years ago. My god’s scripture is much truer than anyone else. I demand that my divine rights be granted. Vacate the land, I’m coming with my people as our god ordained before anyone else was here. So there.

Assuming you could prove you had Abraham’s onanist outpourings, and could trace descendants to the current generation. I assume this would give you a line straight back to your invisible friend which you assume as grounds for scripture as title deed.

Besides, even if the test came back positive, all you’ve proved is the bloodline. The invisible friend still needs to show up in court, and need to to provide a specimen; I see it now; god wanking into a test tube to the sound of hallelujah.

The exceptionalism required to treat one group’s scripture as valid title deed while dismissing all others is itself the argument against it.